Supreme Court objects to ‘unfair reporting’, allows Kappan to meet lawyers

Supreme Court objects to the unfair reporting in the case of Kerala-based journalist Siddique Kappan. In the picture, police taking Kappan (with white cap) and others to court.

Supreme Court objects to the unfair reporting in the case of Kerala-based journalist Siddique Kappan. On Friday, the Supreme Court allowed Kappan to meet his lawyers to sign on the vaqalatnama to facilitate his bail. However the Supreme Court objects to the manner in which the case was reported in the media.

Hearing the habeas corpus petition filed by the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) against custody of Kappan, the Supreme Court bench headed by CJI SA Bobde and comprising Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, allowed senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for KUWJ, to meet his client.  

In the case Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court there was no objection to Kappan meeting his lawyers. “There was no objection and there is no objection,” SG Mehta said. He denied allegations that Kappan’s lawyers were not allowed to meet him. The court has adjourned the matter till next week.

“List after one week. In the meantime, the accused person’s signature can be obtained in jail for taking recourse in courts,” the bench said.

In an affidavit filed in Supreme Court, the UP government claimed that a “completely false narrative” was being made that Kappan was not being permitted to talk to relatives or lawyers. During judicial custody, he had interacted with his family on three occasions on phone on his written request, it said.

“It is pertinent to note that accused Siddique Kappan has never requested to meet any relative or any lawyer nor has file any such application before the competent court/jail authorities till date,” it said.

Kappan was arrested on way to Hathras

Kappan, who works with Malayalam news website Azhimukham, and three others were arrested on October 5 in Mathura while on his way to Hathras where a 19-year-old Dalit woman had been allegedly assaulted and gangraped leading to her death in a Delhi hospital.

Uttar Pradesh Police have alleged that Kappan and two members of the Campus Front of India (CFI) were part of a “conspiracy” to inflame religious enmity over the Hathras rape, and booked them on various charges, including under the stringent UAPA and sedition.

In course of the brief hearing, CJI Bobde said media reports claiming that the court had denied relief to Kappan were “unfair”. “There was very unfair reporting about our earlier order. I am worried about the inaccurate reporting. The reports said that the journalist was refused relief,” the SC said. The bench asked Sibal to go through the reply filed by Uttar Pradesh and file rejoinder. “You have the right to file bail and you read the reply and then we will hear you completely,” the bench said.

SC had sought response from Centre, UP govt

In the last hearing, the SC sought responses from the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government on the plea seeking the release of Kappan while observing that it was “trying to discourage” individuals from filing petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution—which grants individuals the right to approach the top court seeking enforcement of fundamental rights.

In the affidavit filed in Supreme Court, the UP government said Kappan was going to Hathras under the “garb of journalism” with a “very determined design” to create caste divide and disturb law and order situation.

“Kappan was the Office Secretary of Popular Front of India (PFI) who is using a journalist cover by showing identity card of a Kerala-based newspaper named as ‘Tejas’ that was closed in 2018,” the UP affidavit said, according to Live Law.

“Mobile phones, laptop, pamphlets having headlines of ‘Justice for Hathras Victim’ etc were duly seized and information of such arrest was duly conveyed to the relatives,” it further mentioned.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here